Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

I concur, but I also see this as very wishful thinking. The next false flag, mass casualty psy-op will proceed the Congressional vote, just in time to thwart passage. And once it does;

"State-Level Bans Will Remain

Federal law will no longer restrict suppressors, but states like California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, and others will still ban or heavily regulate ownership. Residents in these states will need to continue lobbying at the local level for reform."

Assuming that none of my cynical prediction comes to pass, the patchwork of confederates will make travel with a suppressor very cumbersome.

Until the federal government realizes that millions of Americans are being held hostage in foreign controlled states by their blatantly unconstitutional edicts, and reaffirms the rights as protected by the constitution, this charade will continue.

Question; If a "state" can restrict your constitutionally protected right to "keep and bear arms", what prevents them from restricting your rights "... to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures..." or "... Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted", or "...or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is what is lost in this argument about the second amendment.

Expand full comment
Cheramie III's avatar

Yeah I have hearing loss from years of hunting going through a case or two a year. I make sure my boys have hearing protection when they’re at the range but anything to chip away at our 2A right and sooner or later they will cross the line and I will hate to see that cuz our boat sunk with all our guns 😁😂🤣‼️🇺🇸✝️

Expand full comment

No posts